Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  double standards  >  Current Article

The 1967 Lines Are Sacrosanct Unless Palestinians Violate Them, by Stan Dartkafuhl (PreOccupied Territory via EoZ)

By   /   April 29, 2018  /   No Comments

    Print       Email

Apr. 25, 2018

A column from the humor site PreOccupied Territory.

By Stan Dartkafuhl, legal scholar
The position of the international community on the subject of the 1949 armistice lines between Israel and Jordan, and between Israel and Egypt, has long been clear: Israeli control of any territories beyond those lines constitutes an illegal occupation, and Israel’s permanent border must follow the lines on the armistice map that determined boundaries until the Six-Day War of 1967. Any Israeli activity beyond that frontier violates international law. When Palestinians do it in the other direction, however, as with the Great Return March in Gaza, that’s fine.
Under normal circumstances international law does not distinguish between an armed invasion or one that features no weapons; an organized crossing of an internationally recognized border without the consent of the government on the other side of that border constitutes a bona fide invasion. That much was established regarding Morocco’s annexation of Western Sahara. Masses of unarmed Moroccans simply marched across the border, set up settlements, and there we stand today, with the official position of international legal experts characterizing the influx of Moroccans as an invasion, the repulsion of which justified the use of lethal force. Sovereignty has value in international law.

Click here for full article

    Print       Email

Leave a Reply

You might also like...

Contradictions and holes in the tragic story of the Arab woman killed by a stone (EoZ)

Read More →