Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  International  >  Current Article

New York Times Gets Hysterical Over Netanyahu

By   /   November 12, 2013  /   No Comments

    Print       Email

New York Times Gets Hysterical Over

Netanyahu

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 BY 

HTTP://HONESTREPORTING.COM/NEW-YORK-TIMES-BELITTLES-ISRAELS-IRAN-FEARS/

It must be easy for the editorial board of the New York Times viewing the world from theNew York Times Building in Manhattan. The view from Jerusalem is quite different, especially when considering the prospect of an Iranian nuclear bomb.

In a staff editorial on Iran, the NY Times gives the paper’s official view,  hauling anyone over the coals who might stand in the way of a deal with the Iranians as if reaching a deal is more important than the contents of that deal. And the NY Times reserves special opprobrium for Israel’s prime minister:

Unfortunately, the inconclusive negotiations have given an opening to the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who excoriated the proposed agreement as the “deal of the century” for Iran before it is made public, to generate more hysterical opposition.

Netanyahu has pointedly not opposed negotiations with Iran. But he is entitled to express his legitimate concern and to oppose any deal that may leave the threat of a nuclear Iran hanging over Israel like a proverbial sword of Damocles.

But why does the NY Times believe that Netanyahu is responsible for generating “hysterical opposition?” The term would imply some sort of irrational behavior and perhaps is indicative of the NY Times’ general disdain for the Israeli prime minister.

Even Time Magazine, also not known for its favorable treatment of Netanyahu, acknowledges “even if Netanyahu has worn out his welcome, some of the West’s leading experts on nuclear proliferation are making much the same case,” before quoting Olli Heinonen, a former deputy director of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency, now at Harvard, and David Albright, an American former IAEA inspector, who runs the Institute for Science and International Security, the Washington think tank that does the most-quoted independent research on Iran’s nuclear program.

Does the NY Times also believe that two former IAEA inspectors are also “hysterical?” Or is the only hysteria on show the NY Times’ apparent desperation see an Iranian deal signed at almost any cost?

This latest shot at Netanyahu is part of an identifiable trend on the part of the NY Times, which, as Israeli commentator Avi Issacharoff wrote, “seems to be directing a campaign against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” while Dror Eydar points out that “The Times has a long history of supporting even the faintest of hopes when it comes to reconciliation with ruthless dictators.”

    Print       Email
  • Published: 4 years ago on November 12, 2013
  • By:
  • Last Modified: November 12, 2013 @ 10:01 am
  • Filed Under: International, Israel

Leave a Reply

You might also like...

Is Anti-Semitism the Only Bigotry That’s Subject to Debate? by David Gerstman (The Tower via Israel 21c)

Read More →